Overview:
On
December 19, 2024, the EEOC published a fact sheet, “Wearables in the
Workplace: Using Wearable Technologies Under Federal Employment Discrimination
Laws.” If you’re in HR, the timing probably makes perfect sense—because
wearable data has a way of becoming “HR data” the moment it’s used to explain a
decision, justify a write-up, settle a timecard dispute, or respond to a
complaint.
The
EEOC’s definition of “wearables” is broader than most people assume:
smartwatches and rings, yes—but also proximity and environmental sensors, smart
helmets and glasses (including tools that may detect fatigue or emotions),
exoskeletons and physical-support devices, and GPS tracking tools. In other
words, if it’s worn on the body and it tracks movement, biometric signals, or
location, the EEOC wants employers thinking about discrimination-law
implications.
And
here’s where things tend to get messy fast. What happens when a manager says,
“The device shows you weren’t where you said you were”? Or when a “fatigue”
indicator starts influencing assignments? Or when activity data becomes the
reason someone is “underperforming”? If the data is treated as definitive
proof—or it’s applied differently across teams—HR ends up dealing with
consistency questions, documentation gaps, and employee trust issues that don’t
show up in the vendor demo.
The
fact sheet also raises a major compliance issue: employer-mandated wearables
that collect health or biometric information may count as an ADA “medical
examination,” and asking for health information (even during device setup) can
be a “disability-related inquiry.” That can quickly turn into questions HR has
to answer—about confidentiality controls, access limitations, and how to
respond when an employee raises a medical restriction, a pregnancy-related
limitation, or requests an accommodation tied to wearable use.
In
this session, we will translate the EEOC’s guidance into practical
clarity—identifying which wearables and data uses create the greatest risk, how
GPS and monitoring features can become intrusive, where ADA and accommodation
issues commonly arise, how biometric data and medical questions can trigger
legal exposure, and how policies and evolving state approaches may reduce
employer liability around medical, privacy, and workplace surveillance
concerns.
Areas
covered in the session:
- Learn
what wearables can impact discriminatory processes
- Learn
which wearables are defined in the EEOC guidance
- Learn
why some of the wearables can be intrusive in the workplace
- Learn
how GPS and other tracking mechanisms can violate an employee's rights
- Learn
which wearables can impact the ADA and reasonable accommodations
- Learn
how biometric data can impact employees if they include medical questions
- Learn
what recommendations are for Employers to use artificial intelligence in the
workplace
- Learn
how some states are mitigating workplace wearables
- Learn
how legislation impacts how surveillance is used in the workplace
- Learn
how privacy is impacted by the use of wearables in the workplace
- Learn how creating policies can reduce Employer’s liability for violations of medical and privacy laws
Handouts:
Attendees will gain access to exclusive handouts, including presentation materials provided by the speaker and additional resources developed by Amorit Education to aid your teams in post-session implementation.
Why
should you attend?
Wearables
and fitness trackers are quickly moving from “optional wellness perks” to tools
that influence safety decisions, productivity monitoring, attendance
verification, and even performance discussions. That shift creates real legal
exposure when the data is inaccurate, used inconsistently, or becomes a proxy
for protected traits—especially when managers start relying on dashboards
instead of context.
This
webinar will help you understand what the EEOC’s December 19, 2024 wearables
fact sheet is signaling to employers and where the most common compliance risks
show up in real workplaces: GPS/location tracking, fatigue and biometric
monitoring, medical questions during setup, and situations that trigger ADA
limits and reasonable accommodation obligations.
You’ll
leave with practical clarity on how to evaluate wearable programs before they
become “landmines”—what to watch for, what questions to ask internally and of
vendors, and how policies and guardrails can reduce liability tied to medical,
privacy, and workplace surveillance concerns while still allowing your
organization to use these tools responsibly.
Who
will benefit?
This
webinar is built for leaders and practitioners who own decisions around
workplace wearables (fitness trackers, GPS/location tools, fatigue/biometric
monitoring) and who must ensure those programs don’t trigger EEOC/ADA,
accommodation, or privacy risk. Those include:
- CHRO
/ VP of HR
- HR
Director / HR Manager
- HR
Business Partner (HRBP)
- Employee
Relations Manager / Workplace Investigations Lead
- HR
Compliance Manager
- In-House
Employment Counsel / Labor & Employment Attorney
- Chief
Compliance Officer / Compliance Manager
- Privacy
Counsel / Data Protection Officer
- EHS
Director / Safety Manager
- Wellness
Program / Benefits Manager
- People
Analytics / Workforce Analytics Lead
- HRIS / HR Technology Manager
- Internal Audit / Risk Manager
Margie Faulk is a senior-level human resources professional with over 18 years of workplace compliance experience and HR consulting experience. A current Compliance Advisor for HR Compliance Solutions, LLC. Margie has worked as an HR Compliance advisor for major corporations and small businesses in the small, large, private, public, and Non-profit sectors. Margie’s new focus is to provide Employers and Professionals with risk management strategies to develop risk management strategies to mitigate workplace violations.
Margie has provided small to large businesses with risk management strategies that protect companies and reduce potential workplace fines and penalties from violations of employment regulations. Margie is bilingual (Spanish) fluent and Bi-cultural. Margie holds a professional human resources certification (PHR) from the HR Certification Institute (HRCI) and SHRM-CP certification from the Society for Human Resources Management. Margie is a member of the Society of Corporate Compliance & Ethics (SCCE). Margie is also a SHRM Credit Provider offering SHRM-CP and SHRM-SPC credits for her training which major HR individuals need to maintain their certification credits.
Enrollment Options
Tags: EEOC Wearables, Fitness Trackers, ADA Compliance, Workplace Surveillance, GPS Tracking, Biometric Data, HR Compliance, Employment Law, Margie Faulk, January 2026, Webinar

